Skip to content

9 Comments

  1. Darius
    November 27, 2024 @ 9:29 am

    Funny, I made a poor review of this lens some days ago, and I have the same conclusion: https://gambajo.wordpress.com/2024/11/04/review-fujinon-xf27mmf2-8-r-wr/

    Reply

    • Michael Govorko
      December 5, 2024 @ 8:21 am

      Hey Darius,
      Thanks for the comment!
      I liked the robot photo from you review, looks very cool and futuristic.

      Reply

  2. Albert Smith
    November 27, 2024 @ 1:39 pm

    I bought the newer version of the XF 27mm f/2.8, with the aperture ring as soon as it was announced and received it before the long delays for supply issues happened. I was happy to have mine while reading of the frustrated people that were unable to get one.

    I believe everything in your article, but would add one negative point that caused me frustration. This lens uses the traditional method of focusing, physically extending the optical elements out for near range subjects. Since it is so small, there is not enough extension available, so the minimum focus distance is too long for things like table top shots or details from a subject. I could live with an aperture of f/2.8, but I was constantly bumping up against the MFD, which was frustrating.

    I liked the size and angle of view, so I bought the Voightlander 27mm f/2 which has a much closer MFD, a faster aperture and very good performance. If you can live with manual focus and you own a camera that the Voightlander is chipped for, it’s a good alternative.

    Reply

    • Michael Govorko
      December 5, 2024 @ 8:31 am

      Thanks for such an insightful comment, Albert!
      The Voigtländer lens does look fantastic, but I didn’t consider it because it’s not very practical for me to use as a lens for capturing everyday life moments.

      Reply

  3. Dean
    November 27, 2024 @ 2:00 pm

    Great write up and the beach soccer photo is such a great moment captured.

    Reply

  4. stanislaw witold zolczynski
    December 1, 2024 @ 2:47 pm

    Well, if 23/2 isn`t sharp enough at f2 is it as sharp at f2,8 comparing to 27mm or sharper?
    For me AF speed is more important then compactness and even with M1 body it will never be Ricoh GR 40mm

    Reply

    • Michael Govorko
      December 5, 2024 @ 8:35 am

      Hey Stanislaw!
      The 27mm f/2.8 is sharp enough for me at f/2.8, and because of its compact size, I like it more right now. Eventually, I decided to sell the 23mm f/2 lens.

      Ricoh GR cameras are indeed very compact, but I don’t like their aesthetics. Plus, the lack of a viewfinder is a dealbreaker for me.

      Reply

  5. Jack Boston
    December 6, 2024 @ 11:46 am

    Hallo Michael, thank You for the Report. I use the older Version of the 2.8/27 since many years. Attached on my Xpro2 and using the optical VF its a real point and shout camera. Also on mountain tours I like these compact combination.
    My best wishes to Tel Aviv

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The maximum upload file size: 96 MB. You can upload: image, audio, video, document, spreadsheet, interactive, text, archive, code, other. Links to YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other services inserted in the comment text will be automatically embedded. Drop file here